Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Mistele

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1968No. 289PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Alienation of affections and criminal conversation are closely related causes of action, usually brought to court on a single complaint. However, they are separate causes of action. The elements required to prove alienation of affections are (1) wrongful conduct on the part of the defendant, (2) plaintiff’s loss of affection or consortium of the spouse, (3) causal connection between such conduct and such loss. Such wrongful conduct must be the controlling cause. The elements of a cause of action for criminal conversation are (1) an actual marriage between the spouses, and (2) sexual…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grunert v. SpaldingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gossens v. Mattoon Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Maahs v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Woodman v. GoodrichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Kundert v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Walter W. Donald v. Polk CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  2. Koestler v. PollardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Dobrient v. CiskowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stoll v. Conway (In Re Conway)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Alaimo v. SchwanzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API