Woodman v. Goodrich
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
The defendant contends that because facts are alleged in the complaint which are sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of damages which she sustained by reason of the alienation of her husband’s affections in the summer of 1936 by the defendant, and the fact that this action was not commenced until November 9, 1938, the plaintiff’s right to maintain any action to recover damages by reason of defendant’s wrongful conduct became barred by the one-year limitation in sec. 330.22 (2), Stats., for the commencement of “actions for damages for seduction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nolin v. PearsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Oppenheim v. . KridelNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Valentine v. PollakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Lockwood v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kline v. AnsellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Hanson v. ValdiviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- P.V.N. Acharya v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Schneider v. MisteleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.