Legal Opinion
Pippenger v. McQuik's Oilube, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided May 31, 1994No. IP 90-195 CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY AND ORDER OF MARCH 25, 1994
BARKER, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of plaintiff, Dr. Joseph I. Pippenger, Jr. (“Pippenger”), for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The defendants, William H. Gruppe (“Gruppe”) and McQuik’s Oilube, Inc. (“MeQuik’s”), have each filed cross motions for summary judgment.
I. Background
Most of the underlying facts are undisputed, although they are characterized differently by the parties and the differences between the inferences drawn from them are vast.
In early 1980, Gruppe started a quick lube business called McQuik’s…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Elan Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Manns v. SkolnikIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- In re National Century Financial Enterprises, Inc., Investment LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2015
- Lincoln National Life Insurance v. SilverDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.