Legal Opinion

Rose v. Foutch

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 23, 1926PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeWITT, J.

The defendant, II. C. Poutch, has appealed from the decree of the Chancellor sustaining the bill of W. L. Rose to rescind a. contract of loan, evidenced by note for $1,000 and deed of trust to a tract of land executed to secure the payment of said note. The suit was based upon false representations made by Poutch to Rose inducing Rose to make the loan, and without which it would not have been made. The representations were that Poutch and his wife had paid $2,500 for the land, and it was worth that sum or more. The land was encumbered with a first mortgage for $1,000 and interest, so that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McBee v. BowmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Noyes v. MeharryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Stewart v. Salisbury Realty & InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Barnard v. Roane Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Mason v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Merriman v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  2. Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
  3. Holt v. American Progressive Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. French v. First Union Securities, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2002
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. State Tire & Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API