Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Northrip

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FITZGERALD, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Carl Northrip, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Pike County Court of Common Pleas following his convictions of sexual crimes involving his minor daughter, S.F. We hold that the trial court erred when it prevented Appellant’s wife from testifying to S.F.’s motive to fabricate the allegations based on the Pennsylvania Rape Shield Statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3104(a), but that this error was harmless in light of Appellant’s telephone conversation with S.F. However, we hold that the trial court erred in treating Appellant’s conviction of New…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NorthripSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. K.S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. LargaespadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. C.D. v. M.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Com. v. Arbogast, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API