Commonwealth v. Northrip
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FITZGERALD, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Carl Northrip, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered in the Pike County Court of Common Pleas following his convictions of sexual crimes involving his minor daughter, S.F. We hold that the trial court erred when it prevented Appellant’s wife from testifying to S.F.’s motive to fabricate the allegations based on the Pennsylvania Rape Shield Statute, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3104(a), but that this error was harmless in light of Appellant’s telephone conversation with S.F. However, we hold that the trial court erred in treating Appellant’s conviction of New…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. CastilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. Cruz-CentenoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. NorthripSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. K.S.F.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. LargaespadaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- C.D. v. M.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Com. v. Arbogast, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.