Legal Opinion

Barr v. Wackman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1975PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuchsberg, J.

Plaintiff brought this shareholder’s derivative action without first making a demand upon the corporation’s board of directors to secure initiation of an action in favor of the corporation or otherwise to remedy the acts of which he complains. He alleges that a demand would have been futile because the board of directors participated in, authorized and approved the challenged acts and its members are themselves subject to liability and, therefore, cannot be expected to vote to sue themselves.

Three of the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the reasons offered in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Brinckerhoff v. . BostwickNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Sage v. . CulverNew York Court of Appeals · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Marx v. AkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Norlin Corp. v. Rooney, Pace Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Francis v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Bansbach v. ZinnNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API