Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Company of Texas and New Idria Mining & Chemical Company v. J. W. Marshall, D/B/A Marshall Pipe & Supply Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1959No. 17161PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

This appeal from an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ suit turns on the nature of an action of trespass to try title and the characteristics of an oil payment in relation to the indispensability of payees as parties plaintiff in a suit by the mineral lessee for trespass to try title to the leasehold. In this case the joinder of absent payees as indispensable parties would oust the court of jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. We hold that the owner of an oil payment is not an indispensable party plaintiff in an action of trespass to try title.

I

The dispute is…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Webster v. FallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Martin v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. H.G. Sledge, Inc. v. Prospective Investment & Trading Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  3. Dorothy Evans Anderson Etc. v. Dr. M. L. MoorerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  4. Katz v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Helen McLanahan Stevens v. Chauncey C. LoomisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API