Legal Opinion

Martin v. Amerman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 2004No. 02-0731PublishedCited by 293 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill

In this case we must decide whether a trespass-to-try-title action is the exclusive means to resolve a dispute between neighbors over the proper location of a boundary line separating their properties, or whether a declaratory judgment action is also an appropriate way. We hold that the Texas trespass-to-try-title statute governs the parties’ substantive rights in this boundary dispute and that they may not proceed under the Texas Declaratory Judgments Act to recover attorney’s fees. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment. 83 S.W.3d 858.

I

This dispute involves locating the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. John G. & Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation v. DewhurstTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Freeman v. McAninchTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Permian Oil Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Land v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by293 opinions

  1. MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Sawyer TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Coinmach Corp. F/K/A Solon Automated Services, Inc. v. Aspenwood Apartment Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  4. John A. Lance, Debra L. Lance, F.D. Franks, and Helen Franks v. Judith and Terry Robinson, Gary and Brenda Fest, Virginia Gray, Butch Townsend and Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control and Improvement District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Wilen v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006

288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API