Legal Opinion

Helen McLanahan Stevens v. Chauncey C. Loomis

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 23, 1964No. 6268PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the dismissal of a diversity action, brought in the district court for the district of Massachusetts, for the want of what the district court determined to be an indispensable party plaintiff. The theory or theories of recovery, and some of the facts are less than clear. This much appears. The sole plaintiff is a citizen of New York. She and her sister Elizabeth are the present income beneficiaries of a residuary trust under the will of their mother, Ella. Elizabeth and her husband, the defendant Loomis, are citizens of Massachusetts. Loomis and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Payne v. HookSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  4. Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., and Eastern Shore Development Corporation, Debtors, Appeal of Vigdor SchreibmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  3. Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Markham, etc v. FayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Rippey v. Denver United States National BankDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1966

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API