Legal Opinion

In re Koetting

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Habeas Coepus. The sheriff of Milwaukee county, to Avhom the writ Avas directed, made return thereto, and the petitioner demurred to such return.

1Opinion of the CourtWinslow, J.

'John B. Koetting was on the 21st day of July, 1893, the cashier and part owner of the South Side Savings Bank, a state banking corporation then doing a banking business in Milwaukee. ITe is held in custody by the sheriff of Milwaukee county upon an information charging him with having on said last-named day received for deposit in said bank a certain sum of money, the said bank then being unsafe and insolvent, and he then knoAving and having good reason to know that such bank Avas unsafe and insolvent, contrary to the provisions of sec. 4541, R. S. *168Upon his application a writ of habeas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Rock River Bank v. SherwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Schultz v. CulbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Van Steenwyck v. SackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  5. State ex rel. Reedsburg Bank v. HastingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. ShoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Ex parte PittmanNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Northwestern National Bank of Superior v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Union State Bank v. Peoples State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API