State v. Shove
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Exceptions from the circuit court for Winnebago county: This action comes up on alleged exceptions filed by the defendant, pursuant to sec. 4720, E. S. These exceptions are stated in narrative form, signed by the presiding circuit judge* accompanied by a certificate of the clerk of the court, and are to the following effect: On April 10, 1896, the defendant was convicted, under sec. 4541, R. S., of the offense of receiving on deposit $300* April 11, 1892, at Manitowoc, and…
Read the full summary
Exceptions from the circuit court for Winnebago county: This action comes up on alleged exceptions filed by the defendant, pursuant to sec. 4720, E. S. These exceptions are stated in narrative form, signed by the presiding circuit judge* accompanied by a certificate of the clerk of the court, and are to the following effect: On April 10, 1896, the defendant was convicted, under sec. 4541, R. S., of the offense of receiving on deposit $300* April 11, 1892, at Manitowoc, and said defendant being aggrieved by certain opinions and directions of the court upon the trial in certain matters of law,…
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed February 23, 1897:
Cassoday, C. J.
The defendant was, at the time in question, the president, manager, director, and stockholder of the “T. C. Shove Banking Company.” As such, he was convicted of having received on deposit April 11,1892, the $300 mentioned, contrary to sec. 4541, B. S. Eliminating from *6•that section what is not applicable here, and it declares, in effect, that “ any officer, director, stockholder, . . . manager, ... or agent of any bank, . . . who shall accept or receive on deposit, or for safe-keepvng, or to loan, -from any person, any money, or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- United States v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Marine Bank v. Fulton BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- McCormick v. HopkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- State ex rel. Town of Holland v. LammersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Leach v. Farmers Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
- McClure v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.