Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Reedsburg Bank v. Hastings

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1860PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPLICATION for a Mandamus. Tbe case will appear sufficiently from tbe opinion of tbe court. . _

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Dixon, C. J.

Tbis is an application for a mandamus to compel tbe respondent, wbo is treasurer of tbe state, to deliver to tbe relator, a corporation organized under the provisions of tbe law authorizing tbe business of banking, certain interest coupons attached to tbe state bonds deposited by tbe relator with tbe respondent as security for tbe redemption of its circulating notes. Tbe proceeding is amicable in its nature, and designed to test tbe validity of that portion of tbe law which regulates, tbe taxation of the capital stock of banks, and which is supposed to have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knowlton v. Board of SupervisorsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Attorney General v. Winnebago Lake & Fox River Plank Road Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Luker v. CurtisIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Van Steenwyck v. SackettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Northwestern National Bank of Superior v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. In re KoettingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Brower v. HaightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API