Nissan North America, Inc. v. Andrew Chevrolet, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
RUDOLPH T. RANDA, Chief Judge.
The above-captioned matter relates to a motor vehicle dealership arrangement between Nissan North America, Inc. (“Nissan,” the manufacturer) and Andrew Chevrolet, Inc. (“Andrew,” the dealership). Andrew moves to dismiss or stay in deference to an ongoing administrative action before the Wisconsin Division of Hearings and Appeals. The administrative action was filed by Andrew several months before Nissan filed the instant action for declaratory relief in federal court. For the reasons that follow, Andrew’s motion is granted and this matter is…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Ameritas Variable Life Insurance v. RoachCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United National Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. R&d Latex Corporation, a Georgia Corporation Royalty Carpet Mills, Inc., a California Corporation, and Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Mydrin, Inc., for Itself and as Successor in Interest to R&d Latex Corp., Plaintiff-Counter v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, Formerly Known as Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, and William C. Morison-Knox and Michael D. ProughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New England Insurance v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Massachusetts Biologic Laboratories of the University of Massachusetts v. MedImmune, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- New England Ins Co v. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009