Legal Opinion

Producers Livestock Marketing Ass'n v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 15, 1957No. 5459PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This is a proceeding brought by petitioner under the Hobbs Act1 seeking *194review of an order of the Secretary of Agriculture made under the Packers and Stockyards Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 159 as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 181 et seq.2 Petitioner is a “marketing agency” as defined by the Act and has its principal office at Salt Lake City.3 The United States is named respondent pursuant to statute4 and the Secretary of Agriculture by rule of this court.5 The Denver Union Stockyard Company is a “stockyard owner” as defined by the Act and has intervened as a party in interest upon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Carnes v. St. Paul Union Stockyards Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Yapp v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Farmers' Livestock Commission Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Citizens for Allegan County, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission, City of Allegan, Michigan, Consumers Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. Fred S. Aikins v. United States and Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. BurchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Central Monserrate, Inc. v. Junta Azucarera de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1961
  5. Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API