Legal Opinion

Polzin v. Lischefska

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1925No. 24,609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This is an action for malicious prosecution in which the plaintiff had a verdict and the court rendered judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff was indicted for drawing a check on the First National Bank of Springfield and delivering it to defendant in payment for goods purchased, knowing that he had no funds or credit with the bank for the payment of the check. He was arrested on a bench warrant, and thereafter tried and acquitted. This action followed.

To establish his cause of action, plaintiff must prove that the criminal prosecution was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cox v. LauritsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Schott v. Indiana National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Hanowitz v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. Eastman v. Leiser Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. Lammers v. MasonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Osco Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Jay Nygard v. City of OronoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  3. Survis v. A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Reiherzer v. BreskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Beske v. SackettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API