Legal Opinion
Allen v. Osco Drug, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 17, 1978No. 47272PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
Oseo Drug, Inc. (Oseo Drug), and Maurice Gintz appeal from an order denying their post-trial motion and from judgment in a malicious-prosecution action. After a trial in district court, a jury found by special verdict that appellants had maliciously and without probable cause instituted criminal proceedings against respondent, Mary Bea Allen. Appellants’ motion for an order amending jury’s verdict or in the alternative, for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or for a new trial was denied. We affirm.
The issues presented on appeal are:(1) Did the trial court err in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Martin v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Giant of Virginia, Inc. v. PiggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
- Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Benson Cooperative Creamery Ass'n v. First District Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. Marquette Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
- Stead-Bowers v. LangleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Lundberg v. ScogginsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- U.S. Fire Insurance Company v. Beltmann North American Co., Inc., and James J. CashCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Jay Nygard v. City of OronoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.