Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Davis & Weber Counties Canal Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1913No. 2547PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Second District; Eon. J. A. Eoioell, Judge. Action by Jacob Jensen against tbe Davis and Weber Counties Canal Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

1,2 This was an action to recover damages alleged to bave been caused by seepage or percolation. from an irrigating canal. Tbe plaintiff, respondent bere, as a cause of action, .after stating tbe corporate capacity ..of the defendant, *12appellant in this court, in substance alleged that at tbe time of tbe injuries complained of be was tbe owner and in possession of certain lands in Davis County, Utab, on wbicb were growing fruit trees and alfalfa grass; tbat tbe appellant for many years prior to tbe injuries complained of had owned and operated, and then owned and operated, through a. portion…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lisonbee v. Monroe Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Jenkins v. Hooper Irrigation Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Belnap v. WiddisonUtah Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. AMS Salt Industries, Inc. v. Magnesium Corp. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Erickson v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. MacKay v. BreezeUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Charvoz v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API