Legal Opinion
Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1951No. 13001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Beecher alleges that he has filed in the district court certain notices of appeal which he describes as follows: Notice of Appeal June 5, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 13, 1951; Notice of Appeal June 30, 1951; Notice of Appeal August 4, 1951.
He seeks our order to permit him to appeal forma pauperis. His affidavit fails to describe the error he claims in any one of the orders appealed from. That is to say, he does not state the nature of the appeal, the merits of which we are required to consider before granting him the right to appeal in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); Huffman v. Smith, 9…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Huffman v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- Monetary II Limited Partnership, J. Thomas Hannan, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Matter of the Application of Clayton C. Pierce, for a Writ of Habeas CorpusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- S. P. Beecher v. Homer Smithson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Joseph DutyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959