Legal Opinion
Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 24, 1953No. 13693, 13937, 14020-14028PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Chief Judge.
Beecher is seeking a ruling by this court on that which he terms “a jurisdictional point of law in section 75(s) [11 U.S.C.A. § 203(s) ] proceedings” which requires that all proceedings subsequent to an alleged tender of redemption be set aside as beyond the jurisdiction of the court.
Although all but one of the appeals (No. 13,693) in which Beecher seeks this ruling have been dismissed, 1 we shall consider the question at this point because of its importance to the protracted Beecher litigation. 2
In 1939, Beecher, a farmer, found himself in financial difficulties and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Schine Chain Theatres, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Beecher v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- S. P. Beecher v. Homer Smithson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Beecher v. Leavenworth State BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Malee Price v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012