Legal Opinion

Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Joseph Duty

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 1, 1959No. 264PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant’s affidavit in support of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis states only in general terms the nature of the litigation and does not state the alleged error or errors on the part of the District Judge, about which he complains. The affidavit fails to show what merit, if any, there is in his appeal. Morris v. Igoe, 7 Cir., 209 F.2d 108; Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 191 F.2d 812, certiorari denied 343 U.S. 954, 72 S.Ct. 1048, 96 L.Ed. 1354.

The affidavit is insufficient to support the application to proceed in forma pauperis, Kenney v. Fox, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 288,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herbert Harrison Loum v. Honorable Mell G. Underwood, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Eastern Division, Southern District of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. Kenney v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  3. Frank Cuiksa v. The City of Mansfield, Clark Denny Hertzler v. The City of Mansfield and Glen W. Marriott, Frank L. Smith v. The Village of Butler, Robert E. Harris and Ronald ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
  4. Morris v. Igoe, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Willie Hullom v. Lester Burrows, Roy S. McCrimmon Horace W. Adams, Victor Beck, Don Hardy, Otto Beulow, John W. Slusser and Carl D. MosierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yager v. RaisorDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1962
  2. Dupont v. Southern Pacific Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API