Legal Opinion

Bank of Commerce v. Sams

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 9, 1915No. 19,685PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal'from Neosho district court; James W. Finley, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

DAWSON, J.:

The chief question in this case arises from the admission of certain testimony offered by the defendant in an action to recover on a note given for certain bonds issued by a cement company. Defenses of misrepresentation and fraud and want of consideration were eliminated by the district court. Another defense was the alteration of the note after its execution and without the • defendant’s consent, but this case should be determined upon the main defense, which was a verified denial of the plaintiff’s ownership of the instrument.

The note was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Plymouth County Bank v. GilmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Burgess & Co. v. BlakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  3. Mendenhall v. School District No. 83Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Ellicott v. BarnesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Simpson v. WaldbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Life Insurance v. NaborsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Kansas National Drill & Manufacturing Co. v. ReddSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Marsol Credit Co. v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API