Legal Opinion

Ellicott v. Barnes

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Riley District Court. September 12, 1883, the-district court ordered that the defendant Ellicott, as assignee of the Eiley County Bank of Manhattan, pay to plaintiff Barnes, out of the first money received by him of the assets of said bank, the sum of $559.13, with interest from the date aforesaid, and also adjudged that plaintiff recover his costs herein. The defendant brings the foregoing order and judgment to this court. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hokton, C. J.:

This was an action brought by J. H. Barnes, to charge the assets of the Riley County Bank of Manhattan, in this state, in the hands of Joseph T. Ellieott, its assignee, with a trust in his favor for the sum of $500, which he delivered to J. K. Winckip, as cashier of the bank, on December 21, 1881, for the purpose, as he alleges, of paying a note executed to the bank prior to that date, but at the time owned and held by the Harrison National Bank of Cadiz, Ohio. He obtained a judgment in his favor, which the plaintiff in error claims is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peak v. EllicottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kimmel v. DicksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Chancellor v. ChancellorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Naltner v. DolanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Griffin v. ChaseNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API