Simpson v. Waldby
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Lenawee. (Howell, j.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff brought suit in justice’s court to recover a balance claimed to be due him on account of five drafts, of 8100 each, drawn by him upon O. S. Rixford, of East Highgate, Vermont. These drafts were made payable to the order of Waldby & Clay, the defendants, bankers at Adrian, Michigan, who undertook the collection of the same.
The drafts were dated,” and paid by Rixford, as appears upon their face, respectively, as follows:
*441March 1, 1884, paid March 14, 1884.
March 10, 1884, paid March 22, 1884.
March 18, 1884, paid March 22, 1884.
March 26, 1884, paid April 3, 1884.
March 31, 1884, paid…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF WASHINGTON v. Triplett & NealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Hoover v. WiseSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Ayrault v. . the Pacific BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Lane v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Plymouth County Bank v. GilmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Bailie v. Augusta Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Streissguth v. National German-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Hommerberg v. State Bank of SlaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Rott v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.