Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sparling v. Hitsman

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1935No. 7,430PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewaet

Application for a writ of mandate. This is an original proceeding brought by J. T. Sparling, a taxpayer of Daniels county, in his own behalf and in the interest and for the benefit of other citizens, against the county treasurer of that county. The proceeding involves the constitutionality of an Act of the Twenty-Fourth Legislative Assembly, recently adjourned.

The legislation in question is Chapter 88 of the Laws of 1935. The essential part of the Act reads as follows: “Section 1. That from and after the passage and approval of this Act, any person having an interest in real estate heretofore…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Jones v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Hilger v. MooreMontana Supreme Court · 1919

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Linder v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bradbury & Stamm Construction Co. v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. State v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State Ex Rel. Dufresne v. LeslieMontana Supreme Court · 1935

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API