Legal Opinion

Slotte v. Gustin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered in an auto accident when the car in which plaintiff was riding as a passenger collided with one driven by the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Plaintiff assigns error in certain instructions given by the court.

The court instructed the jury that the drivers of both vehicles had a duty to exercise reasonable care in keeping a lookout and that such duty should be applied to both drivers in determining whose negligence, if any, caused the accident.

While…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frangos v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Whitehead v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Whisnant v. HollandOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Shearer v. LantzOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Tonseth v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Smith v. WetherellOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Fenton v. AleshireOregon Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API