Legal Opinion

Shearer v. Lantz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEB CUBIAM.

Plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment following a jury verdict in a personal injury action growing out of a collision between two automobiles.

The plaintiff’s brief presents nothing for the consideration of this court. It contains two purported assignments of error. The first reads:

“The Court erred in failing to grant a new trial for the reason that the jury’s verdict was against the law, and that there was no evidence to support such a verdict.”

Denial of a motion for a new trial based upon alleged errors committed on the trial, of which errors the appellant had knowledge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Mason v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Diller v. Riverview DairyOregon Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. KLEMGARD v. Wade Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. TruxallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API