Shearer v. Lantz
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
PEB CUBIAM.
Plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment following a jury verdict in a personal injury action growing out of a collision between two automobiles.
The plaintiff’s brief presents nothing for the consideration of this court. It contains two purported assignments of error. The first reads:
“The Court erred in failing to grant a new trial for the reason that the jury’s verdict was against the law, and that there was no evidence to support such a verdict.”
Denial of a motion for a new trial based upon alleged errors committed on the trial, of which errors the appellant had knowledge…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Mason v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Diller v. Riverview DairyOregon Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Wills v. PETROSOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. BlakeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- KLEMGARD v. Wade Seed Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. TruxallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.