Stimpson v. Wellington Service Corp.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.
In three actions of tort, consolidated for trial, after the jury had returned verdicts for the plaintiffs (whom we refer to respectively as Stimpson, Inter-chemical and Phelps-Dodge) the judge reserved leave to enter verdicts for the defendant and reported to this court two issues of law in each case: 1. Were the alleged violations of law a condition or a proximate cause of the damage? 2. Were the verdicts supported by proof of negligence or founded on conjecture and speculation?
With the report we have the transcript of the evidence before the jury and an auditor’s report. In 1962 Stimpson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cook v. Farm Service Stores, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Kralik v. LeClairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Gates v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- West v. Molders Foundry Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Piontek v. Joseph Perry, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schrottman v. BarnicleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Resendes v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
- Petchel v. CollinsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003