Legal Opinion

Essex Packers Limited v. Kisecker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 25, 1953No. Appeals, 39 and 50PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Jones,

The plaintiff, Essex Packers Limited, sued Ethel Kiseeker and her husband, Percy K. Kiseeker, as co-partners, trading under the fictitious name, Darby Sea Food Company, for the unpaid balance due for merchandise sold by the plaintiff to the company. The defendants filed separate answers. Ethel Kiseeker denied that she was a co-partner with her husband in the company or that she had any interest whatsoever in the business. Percy K. Kiseeker likewise denied any business partnership with his wife and averred that he was the sole owner of the business being conducted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Hanick v. LeaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Thomas F. Leonard Co. v. Scranton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Reichner v. ReichnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. McAmbley v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Dora v. DoraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Falgiatore v. FalgiatoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Paramount Lithographic Plate Service, Inc. v. Hughes Printing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1977
  5. Dora v. DoraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API