Legal Opinion

McAmbley v. Martin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1930No. Appeal 288PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

We think plaintiff’s evidence showed him guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law, and bad there been a written point for binding instructions presented we would enter judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto. For want of it we can only-order a new trial: Leonard Co. v. Scranton Bottling Co., 90 Pa. Superior Ct. 360, 363.

When seventy-five feet distant from a right angle road intersection and traveling at a speed of twenty to twenty-five miles an hour plaintiff saw defendant’s car approaching from his right about two hundred feet away, and did not look…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wescott v. GeigerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Morgan v. Duquesne BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Thomas F. Leonard Co. v. Scranton Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Beard v. Reading City Passenger Railway Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holt v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Goddard v. Armour & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Essex Packers Limited v. KiseckerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Swalina v. PisalskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Jackson v. CurrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API