Legal Opinion

McKinney v. City of Grosse Pointe Park

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 15, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-40387PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND

GADOLA, District Judge.

Plaintiff initiated the instant action by filing his complaint on July 8, 1999 in the 36th Judicial District Court, State of Michigan, Civil Action No. 99-117308-NO. On July 16, 1999 plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. Both plaintiff and defendants are citizens of Michigan. See second amended complaint, ¶¶ 1-3. On October 4, 1999, defendants filed a notice of removal, seeking to remove the instant case to this Court. Shortly thereafter, on October 12, 1999, plaintiff filed his objection to removal. The Court will…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Ahearn v. Charter Township of BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  5. Brett Strong Lauri Strong v. Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc. Thomas S. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of New Rochelle v. Town of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
  2. Majeske v. Bay City Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. Broad, Vogt & Conant, Inc. v. Alsthom Automation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  4. Noble v. The Young Men's Christian Association of Central OhioDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API