Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Hanavan & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles J. Gaughan, J.

This is an application by respondent pursuant to CPLR 7503 (subd. [c]) for an order permanently staying arbitration of the claim herein on the grounds:

1. That the protection afforded by article 17-A of the Insurance Law does not extend MVAIC coverage to the accident in question;

2. that the accident did not involve a hit-and-run or unidentified motor vehicle;

3. that claimant has failed to exercise reasonable efforts or diligently pursue her remedies against the parties involved;

4. that the accident was never properly reported to the police within 24 hours; and

5. that claimant has otherwise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. McKay v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & GianniNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Sinclair v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Zweibel v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Hanavan & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. People v. WenceslaoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1972
  3. In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & Di NotoNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Matter of McNerlin v. ArgentoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API