Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Allcity Insurance & Di Noto

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHarold Baer, J.

Application to stay arbitration is granted pending a trial of the preliminary issue whether the insurance policy which covered the alleged offending vehicle was validly canceled prior to the date of the accident in issue. The Hartford Insurance Group shall be added as a party respondent upon service of a copy of the order to be entered hereon with notice of entry, together with all papers submitted in this proceeding. Petitioner is entitled to litigate the validity of the cancellation, particularly where no reason is given for such action.

Respondents did not waive the right to arbitrate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Continental National American Group Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Brown v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  3. In re the Arbitration between Hanavan & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. In re the Arbitration between Mailman & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & DoyleNew York Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. BleendAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API