Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Gianni

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.

Claimant, an “insured” person as defined in article 17-A of the Insurance Law, operated an automobile which was in collision with a truck. It is conceded that she thereby sustained bodily injury. At the .scene the operator of the truck came to the claimant’s car and furnished her with what purported to be his name and address, the license number of the truck, and the name of his insurance company. The address given by the operator was entirely fictitious and the owner of the vehicle bearing the license number furnished to claimant denies that his vehicle was involved in the collision.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Hanavan & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Lois Bush and Randy Busch v. Johnson-Sewell Ford Lincoln Mercury, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  3. Lois Bush and Randy Busch v. Johnson-Sewell Ford Lincoln Mercury, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API