Legal Opinion
People v. Gravino
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 11, 2010No. 77, 78PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*550OPINION OF THE COURT
Read, J.
We hold that because they are collateral rather than direct consequences of a guilty plea, Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) registration and the terms and conditions of probation are not subjects that a trial court must address at the plea hearing. Put another way, a trial court’s neglect to mention SORA or identify potential stipulations of probation during the plea colloquy does not undermine the knowing, voluntary and intelligent nature of a defendant’s guilty plea.
I
Gravino
By indictment filed on February 6, 2007, defendant Tara Gravino was charged with rape…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- People v. PequeNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. MaracleNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. HarnettNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. MonkNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.