San Antonio Street Railway Co. v. Muth
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
NEILL, Associate Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of $2935, recovered by appellee by reason of injuries inflicted upon his minor child by the negligence of appellant, whereby he lost her services during her minority, and incurred certain expenses, etc. The nature of the case fully appears from the court’s conclusions of law and fact.
Conclusions of Pact.—The appellant is, and was on the 23rd day of December, 1891, a street railway company, operating its line of railway for carrying passengers over several streets of the city of San Antonio, Texas.. On said day plaintiff’s daughter,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Payne v. BenhamTexas Supreme Court · 1856
- Cuming v. . Brooklyn City R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Michels v. BorutaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Morris v. Grand Avenue Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Triay v. SealsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. ChastainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. TravisTexas Supreme Court · 1935
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.