Legal Opinion
Michels v. Boruta
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided November 4, 1938No. 1845PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FUNDERBURK, Justice. •
Mrs. Stella Boruta, joined by her husband, Vincent J. Boruta, brought this suit against Henry M. Michels, to recover damages for the acts presently to be described. L. M. DeLano, former husband of Stella Boruta, intervened and as a party plaintiff sought recovery of damages for the same acts.
The pleadings of plaintiffs described a plot of land and alleged its long prior dedication as a public cemetery and burial ground with continuous recognition of it as such. It was alleged that in 1904 a child of Stella Boruta (then Stella DeLano) and her husband L. M. DeLano, which…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HennesseyTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TrottTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Horton v. HouseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Rowe v. HortonTexas Supreme Court · 1885
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Donnelly v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Rocky Mountain Produce Trucking Co. v. JohnsonNevada Supreme Court · 1962
- Travelers Ins. Co. v. Reed Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.