Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Miller

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1890No. 3259PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from Harrison. Tried below before Hon. A. J. Booty.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff sues to recover damages for injury done to his wife, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of servants of receivers then in charge of appellant’s railway, whereby she was injured in alighting from a train.

A judgment for $2500 was rendered for the plaintiff, and there is no claim that this is excessive; but it is urged that the court should have granted a new trial on the ground that the weight of the evidence showed that the train remained at the station where plaintiff’s wife was to léave it a sufficient length of time for her to have alighted with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. New Orleans, Jackson, & Great Northern Railroad v. StathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WorthamTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Choate v. San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Texas Loan Agency v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  5. Moreland v. Hawley Independent School Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API