Legal Opinion
Riedy v. Bidwell
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 18, 1928No. Docket No. 6286PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J., pro tem.
Two actions were brought, one by Elizabeth Riedy and Tom Riedy, husband and wife, against George M. Bidwell, and the other by Charles Cook against George M. Bidwell. The former is to recover $12,250.92, based upon two causes of action, one for services alleged to have been rendered by plaintiff Elizabeth Riedy and the other on an assigned claim of E. M. Tinney, both causes of action being based upon the same ground. The latter action is brought to recover $6,125.46 upon "the same theory as is set forth in the action of Elizabeth and Tom Riedy against George M. Bidwell.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Falkner v. HendyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Riedy v. BidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Heinfelt v. ArthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- YDM Mgmt. Co. v. Sharp Cmty. Med. Grp., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Baxter v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- DeMirjian v. Ideal Heating Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.