Drott v. People
Supreme Court of Colorado
Plaintiff in error was convicted of burglary and larceny. On Application for Supersedeas. Error to the District Court of Montrose County, Hon. Thomas J. Black, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Teller
The plaintiff in error was convicted under both counts of an information charging him, first, with burglary, and, second, with grand larceny. The information charged that these offenses were committed on. the 29th day of November, 1917. The information was filed on the 22nd day of *384November, 1920. The conviction under the second count was of larceny of goods of the value of §17.60. The offense was therefore a misdemeanor.
For the plaintiff in error it is contended that more than eighteen months having elapsed after the time at which the offense of larceny charged in the second count was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PicettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. Di PasqualeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
- Hardesty v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- Swenson v. Mahopac Iron Ore Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1889
- Hammock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Robert E. Askins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
- State v. KingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Cane v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- State v. LaSelvaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.