People v. Picetti
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. Carroll Cook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The defendant was informed against on the twelfth day of September, 1898, by the district attorney of the city and county of San Francisco, for the crime of grand larceny, alleged to have been committed on the fifteenth day of March, 1897. He was tried and convicted of petit larceny. This appeal is taken from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.
As the sole ground for the appeal, it is claimed that the defendant haying been convicted of petit larceny, the judgment is void, inasmuch as the statute of limitations bars the prosecution of the defendant, under such…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Doble v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Padie v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.