Legal Opinion

State v. Markham

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 22, 1985No. 5349-1-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunson, J.

Lawrence D. Markham appeals his convictions of conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to commit first degree theft, fraud in connection with the offer and sale of a security (nine counts), first degree theft (nine counts), and sale of unregistered securities. He contends: (1) RCW 21.20.010 is void for vagueness; (2) a certain attorney opinion letter should have been admitted into evidence; (3) the jury should have been instructed intent to permanently deprive is an element of any form of first degree theft; (4) the jury should have received the WPIC instruction on criminal intent;…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,748 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Glenn W. Turner Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. State v. TharpWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. AmezolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  2. State v. SlemmerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. State v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. MahmoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. State v. RamosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API