Legal Opinion

State v. Amezola

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 1987No. 16350-7-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.

J.— Gudelia Morales-Ramirez (Ramirez) appeals her conviction for possession of heroin with intent to deliver. She alleges that the trial court erred (1) in denying her motion to suppress evidence on the ground that the police violated RCW 10.31.040, the "knock and announce" rule, (2) in denying her motions to sever offenses and defendants, (3) in giving the "to-convict" and accomplice instructions and in refusing to give three of her proposed instructions regarding dominion and control and constructive possession. She also contends that the trial court erred(4) in denying her motions to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. GuloyWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. PetrichWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ArndtWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. PartinWashington Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API