Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 4, 1922No. 3 Div. 513PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of the murder of Mrs. Laura Gafford, and his punishment fixed at death. ■

This is the second appeal in this cause. Crenshaw v. State, 205 Ala. 256, 87 South. 328. Upon the former appeal it was held that the trial court will not be reversed in holding that Camie Cheatham, a negro girl 6 or 8 years of age, was competent to testify, in view of her voir dire examination. The court is of the opinion that the testimony upon this question is not so materially different upon this appeal as to justify a contrary conclusion. This observation applies also to the admissibility of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Godau v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Rollings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Boyette v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Gholston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API