Boyette v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.
As a rule, when a defendant’s general character is put in issue, the evidence should be confined to the time of and anterior to the alleged commission of the offense to which he was being tried. White v. State, 111 Ala. 92, 21 So. 33. When, however, character evidence is offered to discredit a witness who has testified, it can include all time anterior to the time said witness testifies. The defendant did not put his general character in issue, and the state had no right to do so except so far as it may have affected his credibility as a witness, and the trial court erred in not limiting the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rollings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Crenshaw v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
3Cited by40 opinions
- McKee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
- Barbour v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Kabase v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Hyche v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1927
- Flannagin v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.