Legal Opinion

Findlen v. Winchendon Housing Authority

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 3, 1990No. 89-P-112PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Although the construction contract between the Winchendon Housing Authority (Authority), as owner, and Fred J. Findlen & Sons (Findlen), as general contractor, contained a sweeping provision disclaiming any liability by the owner for job delays, Findlen obtained, on account of delay damages, a judgment for $29,056.82, the amount it paid in a separate action to one of its subcontractors, plus $2,500 in attorney’s fees. We conclude that through a series of memoranda and letters the owner modified the scope of the original provision exculpating it from a duty to pay delay damages and we affirm…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. M. L. Shalloo, Inc. v. Ricciardi & Sons Construction, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Coleman Bros. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Chas. T. Main, Inc. v. Massachusetts Turnpike AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
  5. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp. v. Southern New England Steel Erection Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bonacorso Construction Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. XL Specialty Insurance v. Massachusetts Highway DepartmentMassachusetts Superior Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API