Legal Opinion

XL Specialty Insurance v. Massachusetts Highway Department

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided January 3, 2013No. SUCV200804093Published

1Opinion of the Court

Billings, Thomas P., J.

For want of a nail the shoe was lost; For want of a shoe the horse was lost; For want of a horse the battle was lost; For the failure of battle the kingdom was lost —-All for the want of a horse-shoe nail.1

Disregard of seemingly small details can have costly consequences. At issue in this case is whether, and in what amount, the plaintiff {“XL”), as surely and sub-rogee of general contractor Roads Corporation (“Roads”), may recover damages incurred as a result of a two-year delay in a roadway reconstruction and bridge replacement project at Winter Street, Waltham. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  4. Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  5. Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API