XL Specialty Insurance v. Massachusetts Highway Department
Massachusetts Superior Court
1Opinion of the Court
Billings, Thomas P., J.
For want of a nail the shoe was lost; For want of a shoe the horse was lost; For want of a horse the battle was lost; For the failure of battle the kingdom was lost —-All for the want of a horse-shoe nail.1
Disregard of seemingly small details can have costly consequences. At issue in this case is whether, and in what amount, the plaintiff {“XL”), as surely and sub-rogee of general contractor Roads Corporation (“Roads”), may recover damages incurred as a result of a two-year delay in a roadway reconstruction and bridge replacement project at Winter Street, Waltham. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Grant Construction Co. v. BurnsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.