Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark A. Morgan, Walker Labrunerie, Charles J. Weber

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 8, 1996No. 95-4102PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

After determining that Walker LaBruner-ie’s inculpatory statement was given in the course of plea discussions, the district court suppressed the statement under Rule 11(e)(6)(D) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The government appeals. We reverse.

I. BACKGROUND

This appeal involves a troublesome situation in which law enforcement agents sought a suspect’s cooperation and are now attempting to use his statements against him. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) conducted an investigation into corruption in the city…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Andrew Jackson RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Martin M. Rachlin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. Ermil GrantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Kevin M. HareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. Mary K. EdelmannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Gilberto SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Rogelio Hernandez, Jr., Also Known as RoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Ralph A. WeinbenderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Leland Duane YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API