Legal Opinion
Martin M. Rachlin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 9, 1983No. 83-1250PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
This is a direct appeal from Martin M. Rachlin’s conviction for passing a counterfeit bill in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472. Rachlin contends that certain oral and written statements made by him should have been suppressed by the district court. He contends the statements are inadmissible because they were made as a part of plea negotiations under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11(e)(6)(D), that the statements were made involuntarily, and were made because of ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition, Rachlin claims the government failed to introduce sufficient corroborative…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Byron Halsey v. Frank PfeifferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Frank M. Miller, Jr. v. Peter J. Fenton, Superintendent, Rahway State Prison, Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General, State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- United States v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- State v. WaltonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. Franklin Evon Sebetich A/K/A Frank, Earl Dean, Jr., A/K/A Dooney, Michael John BuhoveckyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.