Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Lebron

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 21, 2006No. 05-P-838PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant was convicted of violating a restraining order, pursuant to G. L. c. 209, § 3B. Following the trial judge’s instructions to the jury, defense counsel specifically objected to the judge’s failure to give the full reasonable doubt charge as stated in Commonwealth v. Webster, 5 Cush. 295, 320 (1850). *908On appeal, the defendant argues that (1) the trial judge’s allegedly deficient instructions on reasonable doubt violated his due process rights; and (2) the defendant’s right to a fair trial was compromised.

“In reviewing a reasonable doubt instruction, we consider whether there is a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. GagliardiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. PinckneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  2. Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API