Commonwealth v. Lebron
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of violating a restraining order, pursuant to G. L. c. 209, § 3B. Following the trial judge’s instructions to the jury, defense counsel specifically objected to the judge’s failure to give the full reasonable doubt charge as stated in Commonwealth v. Webster, 5 Cush. 295, 320 (1850). *908On appeal, the defendant argues that (1) the trial judge’s allegedly deficient instructions on reasonable doubt violated his due process rights; and (2) the defendant’s right to a fair trial was compromised.
“In reviewing a reasonable doubt instruction, we consider whether there is a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DomanskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Commonwealth v. FitzgeraldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Commonwealth v. JamesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Commonwealth v. GagliardiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Commonwealth v. PinckneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AndrewsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017