Commonwealth v. Andrews

After a jury trial in the District Court, the defendant was convicted of breaking and entering a motor vehicle with the intent to commit a misdemeanor.2 He appeals, arguing that the judge erred in denying his motion for a required finding of not guilty because the Commonwealth presented insufficient evidence to show that he had the requisite intent to commit the misdemeanor. We affirm.

"When reviewing a motion for a required finding of not guilty, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth. Commonwealth v. Latimore, 378 Mass. 671, 676-677 (1979). We must consider…